Impact of Technology on Indian Society

In the globalized age where boundaries have been nullified, where technology has made the World a small space, the impact of science and technology needs to be analyzed to get a better understanding of the influence it can create throughout various kinds of people and places. Technology is practically everywhere today-it has changed the way we prepare food, we buy our clothes, and we build our homes. It has changed the way we send our posts, we take our exams, and we fill up our forms and the way we resort to comfort and entertainment. Computers, the most visible impact of technology have come a long way from being huge machines locked up in a room to tiny palmtops with more features added every day. It has all the functions of a calculator, a music player, a home theatre, a video camera and practically a better tool than a pen and a sheet of paper. With more features and functions, computers have led to loss of jobs for millions. In this context, we can look at the impact of technology, in the Indian context.

Computers arrived in India in the 1970s and with the formation of Hindustan Computers Limited (HCL) in 1976; India formally entered the computers club. Interestingly, HCL launched its operations in India a month ago before IBM came to the Indian market. By the 1980s, HCL introduced data operating and processing computers in Indian corporations. However, it was after 1986, when the then Prime Minister Rajeev Gandhi took the initiative to lower duty on hardware and software, the Indian computer Industry began to grow. However, this growth was not smooth. In 1992, when Hindustan Computers Limited (HCL) organized a huge launch of their computers in a function at Calcutta displaying the need of every office in the state to use computers; there were huge demonstrations and protests. The reason- people were about to lose their jobs as the work previously done by them would now be done by the computers. This kind of outburst is not rare; every developing country where computers have now become an integral tool has experienced such protests which cannot be termed as baseless.

Now, how much computers have touched the people, barring the urbane remains to be asked. In 2002, in Vardhaman district of West Bengal, the ruling CPI(M) government boasted of modernization in villages and availability of computers in every rural school. That was not merely a claim; the schools were actually provided computers. But the irony is that, in the district, which was declared the most literate district, literacy remains at writing one’s own name without even knowing the alphabets. So computers remained government toys without any objective of being there.
On the other hand, in Kerala, officially the most literate state in India launched a similar programme. There, most of the school kids not only knew why they need to know computers, but their parents also knew the usefulness of learning computers. They have an objective to learn computers-to be more equipped so that they get good jobs.
Now, the difference is clear, technology can become useful tools, only if ones progresses knowing the need to learn that. Just by introducing computers without any objective can prove a loss, both of government money and human resource. The basic infrastructure needs to be developed to a large extent. Basic education must be ensured in each and every place in India, across diverse social groups, if India wants to feel the impact of computers and stay ahead in the race.
The dotcom boom happened in India during 1999-2000, when new media actually picked up pace and made some real impact. However, convergence was yet to follow. We can safely say that Indians were so overboard with the internet revolution, they didn’t quite pay attention to the development of infrastructure and to plan out the basic objectives of learning computers. True that with the rise of the cyber cafes (starting as a coffee shop called ‘Coffee Day Cyber Cafe’ in 1995,in Bangalore, India have come up a long way to popularize the internet movement. Yet, the reluctance of Indian Companies like HCL and Infosys to continue with hardware development still makes it a distant dream for the lower middle class and the lower class to afford computers. Although India now has a huge global share of technology uses, it mostly due to the over populated metros. The economic issue has surely improved, but the infrastructure is still to be looked at more carefully and steps must be taken up to negate the impact of diversity in a huge and multifaceted country like India ; where only three fifth of the people are literate, most of them only able to ‘draw’ their names!

Growth in technology has both positive and negative impacts on the society. IF we consider mobile phones as technology then positive impacts can be.

1. Phone in pocket, nothing can be better than this. Always connected to world.
2. it’s not only voice and SMS, now mobile phones have GPRS 3G etc which have brought internet in our pockets.

Negative aspects

1. Excessive use of mobiles can cause cancer and mental tensions. People using 2-3 mobile phones are reported to be suffering from lack of sleep, restlessness etc.
Again considering Nuclear energy as a technology. Nuclear energy is like cheapest and long lasting source of energy. But an accident can take away life of whole city.
When we discuss the impact of technology, these questions need to be analyzed as they show the weaker side of the revolution. Technological progress cannot be totally successful unless we increase awareness in the grass root level. It shows how far behind we have remained to catch up with the developed nations. We cannot swank about a global village or the world in fingertips unless we show all the people how technological innovations take place. Only then, the impact of technology will come a huge way forward and science and technology can touch lives, all over the country-not just in metros, but in the rural areas too.

Well people can take up any technology and write about its impact for hours. But the conclusion can be like; everything comes with positive and negative aspect to society. It's up to us individuals to make most out of the positive aspect and nullify the negative one of a particular technology.

Save Narmada save people.

As we all know, the Supreme Court of India has passed an adverse acting order regarding the Sardar Sarovar Project allowing for the Narmada dam to be raised. By claiming to curb itself to the issue of resettlement, the court is being obfuscator with regard to the rights of individuals in our society.
The interim order was passed, based partly on the basis of sworn affidavits from the government of Maharashtra which have recently been canceled by the officials who filed the affidavits. The unlucky follower under this official accompanied the people to the ostensible resettlement site & finally agreed that really there were no land available.
Article 21 is one of the most important articles of Indian constitution. It’s a “Right to life”, the right against arbiter arrest. It also gives Right to livelihood- It includes right to clean living conditions. The universal declaration of 3rd generation right was passed in 1986 that are the right to development & right to self-determination. It gives right to the state or the people to say in the discussion of developments on which they are affected.
In India during 1950 to 1988 more than 55milion people have been displaced by the development project & less than 25% had been rehabilitated.
Such details aside, the provisional order, is a significant challenge to what is possibly the most significant social movement in independent India.
The Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) plans a massive mobilization of people. While political parties do this on a routine basis to establish sham popularity, eternally broke movements like the NBA. The recent Supreme Court order in the matter of Narmada, has stirred up a discussion among the concerned on the judiciary role in protecting the interests of the deprived & the marginalized in probing the ‘ Public Purpose’ of large projects, & in paving the way for sustainable equitable alternatives. The temporary order, confined the states to rise the height of the dam from 32 meters in 1991 to 61 meters in 1993 monsoon, will result in irreparable damages. A large part of the tribal villages in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat & Rajasthan will be affected in the coming monsoon. This is not a time when state have not done enough to rehabilitate those affected at present nor have any readiness for it in the coming months & years.
In the present time, one can say that this fire is bowed in smoke. Nowadays if you talk about this issue you will hardly find people even interested to know about their today’s conditions. Whereas, if you actually look in to this issue it was another bit of successful movement by the people. They have secured their land but have not yet been rehabilitated by the government.